Daily Editors' Notes

When CMS turns carrots into sticks

Share this article:
John O'Connor, editorial director, McKnight's Long-Term Care News
John O'Connor, editorial director, McKnight's Long-Term Care News
In 2003, Premier entered into a unique program with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. The pilot was designed to improve the quality of care its member hospitals delivered.

The 225 nonprofit hospitals that volunteered to participate were spared penalties if they failed to meet benchmarks. Instead, they became eligible for bonuses of up to $2.5 million if they did. It was a very nice incentive. But that was then.

Come Oct. 1, hospitals will have to deal with the other side of that coin. That's when the Medicare program will begin pegging a portion of its payments to the quality of care that hospitals deliver. Medicare is setting aside 1% of the money it normally pays to hospitals – about $963 million – into what is essentially a quality benchmark fund. For hospitals to recoup the 1%, they will need to meet the benchmarks, which include the prevention of readmissions.

For long-term care providers, it may be too soon to see this development as a cautionary tale. After all, the revised hospital payment system hasn't even begun. But that doesn't mean senior living operators shouldn't find a dark cloud around this silver lining.

It's a rare month that CMS does not unveil a new pilot program aimed at improving care. Nothing wrong with that. Nor is there anything wrong with incentives intended to reward superior care.

But problems can result when a one-size-fits-all program is foisted on an entire market — particularly when such a program has financial strings attached.

CMS is about to launch the Independence at Home demonstration. The effort has a worthy goal: keeping chronically ill seniors in their homes and communities for as long as possible.

The program is set up so physicians and nurse practitioners will direct teams of health professionals to coordinate primary home care. For now, here's the carrot: If they reduce Medicare costs by at least 5% (as compared with more traditional office- and hospital-based care), the teams will receive a share of any savings beyond that threshold.

But what happens if or when the 5% goal becomes a requirement? Actually, I think we all know the answer.

Share this article:
close

Next Article in Daily Editors' Notes

Daily Editors' Notes

McKnight's Daily Editor's Notes features commentary on the latest in long-term care news. Entries are written by Editorial Director John O'Connor on Monday and Friday; Staff Writer Tim Mullaney on Tuesday, Editor James M. Berklan on Wednesday and Senior Editor Elizabeth Newman on Thursday.

    ALL MCKNIGHT'S BLOGS

    More in Daily Editors' Notes

    Using the Internet to reduce depression

    Using the Internet to reduce depression

    When I saw the headline "Internet use can help ward off depression among elderly," I figured it was an article written by the owners of It's Never 2 Late, Linked ...

    A jolt to long-term care best practices, amid the Ivy

    A jolt to long-term care best practices, amid ...

    This is going to sound terribly wrong on the face of it. There's no way around it. It appears that the nation's largest association of nursing home operators has just ...

    Is 'person-centered care coordinator' the next must-have staff member?

    Is 'person-centered care coordinator' the next must-have staff ...

    Long-term care operators take note: You soon could fail residents, anger family members, increase survey deficiencies, drop Nursing Home Compare stars and lose money unless you hire a Coordinator of ...