The power of the MDS, and the will to rein it in

Share this article:
James M. Berklan
James M. Berklan

The Minimum Data Set helps determine how resident care is classified and reimbursed. Because it drives providers' fate, virtually from start to finish, operators cling to any nugget they can glean about it. That's why newly released study findings prove so intriguing.

As reported by McKnight's Tim Mullaney in Tuesday's Daily Update, long-term care staffers' understanding of the MDS and its Quality Indicators is considered, well, less than optimal. This unfavorable assessment comes from their supervisors themselves.

That certified nursing aides do not feel in the loop about the expansive assessment tool is not surprising. By job definition, they are often excluded from much of the MDS process. To the extent their managers would like to see them more involved, however, is heartening.

Survey respondents identified six key ways that providers could enhance their staff members' understanding of the 16 MDS Quality Indicators. They begin with education/training (35% of respondents), which would include structured and/or in-service programs. Next, they suggest increased involvement (19%), meaning more engagement in computation, review and interpretation of the QIs.

Ongoing informal training and reminders (18%), meaningful application (13%) and simplification of the MDS and/or QIs (6%) were the next most frequently recommended.

With the observations and responses coming from a group made up mostly of nurse and assessment veterans, it seems that change for the good should be within reach. Survey respondents were mostly managers or long-timers who should be able to have some sway in how staffers are educated and included in MDS and QI affairs. It will be interesting to see if top managers, and their superiors, will take the medicine they called for.

The researchers recommend, naturally, that more research be conducted. It's worth finding out if these results — which were derived from Veterans Administration employees using MDS 2.0 — would be replicated in for-profit and nonprofit facilities of varying sizes.

Power on, I say. This stuff is too compelling to ignore or treat with indifference. Knowledge is power. In this case, it also might improve resident health and care.

James M. Berklan is McKnight's Editor. Follow him @LTCEditorsDesk.

Share this article:

Next Article in Daily Editors' Notes

Daily Editors' Notes

McKnight's Daily Editor's Notes features commentary on the latest in long-term care news. Entries are written by Editorial Director John O'Connor on Monday and Friday; Staff Writer Tim Mullaney on Tuesday, Editor James M. Berklan on Wednesday and Senior Editor Elizabeth Newman on Thursday.


    More in Daily Editors' Notes

    Maybe this sector's bankers need to start taking their own advice

    Maybe this sector's bankers need to start taking ...

    First and foremost, the NIC conference is a conduit that links those with money to those who need it. The event also features informative educational sessions that delve into where ...

    ICD-10 is around the corner, for real this time

    ICD-10 is around the corner, for real this ...

    There's a looming massive report on all the hospital readmissions data in your area and the strategic plan your facility needs to pursue. It involves talking to lots of employees, ...

    The sweet irony of a nursing home report card

    The sweet irony of a nursing home report ...

    It's said that politics, among other things, makes for strange bedfellows. Add long-term care quality improvement efforts to the list.