Time to revamp Medicaid

Share this article:
John O'Connor, editorial director, McKnight's Long-Term Care News
John O'Connor, editorial director, McKnight's Long-Term Care News
As this goes to press, many of the nation's governors are sorting out a major Medicaid decision: Take the money or run.

The “take the money” option is a simpler choice, at least for the short term. Essentially, governors going this route would agree to have most of their Medicaid costs underwritten by the federal government. In exchange, they would agree to expand the pool of people in their state eligible for Medicaid-covered services.

The “run” option seems to be more attractive to governors who fear that the feds may renege on promises to pay, while still insisting on more caregiving requirements. This pick seems to be resonating more with Republican governors.

GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney has said that repealing the law would be one of his first acts, if elected. That result would presumably make things academic. So there's probably a good reason for governors of both political persuasions to hold their tongues until at least November.

Regardless, here's my suggestion: Let's fold Medicaid into the Medicare program.

You can't do that, critics shriek. It would be too complicated and costly. Really? Have you taken a look at how well our current two-track program is playing out on those two fronts?

Look, I'm no fan of putting the federal government in charge of anything beyond creating a serviceable military. But we've been experimenting with this Medicare/Medicaid package deal since the mid-1960s. Anyone out there think this approach is working well? Let me clarify: Anyone out there who does not work for a state agency think this is working well?

The current survey and certification system has shown operators how squirrely and unfair things can get when states are put in charge of things that should be above their pay grade. Anyone with properties in more than one state knows exactly what I am talking about. Is a cracked eggshell a deficiency? Depends on the state, how well the state has trained the surveyor, and what kind of mood the surveyor happens to be in that day.

The choice here is quite simple. We can improve a program that is broken,  inefficient and unfair. Or we can do nothing and hope.
Share this article:

More in News

Large hepatitis outbreak reaches 47 cases, podiatry company denies ManorCare's charges

The number of people infected in an infamous North Dakota Hepatitis C outbreak has risen, state health officials say.

National Quality Forum supports quality measures in bill to standardize post-acute assessments

National Quality Forum supports quality measures in bill ...

The National Quality Forum has come out in strong support of a proposed standardized quality measures, such as skin integrity, across different types of post-acute care settings. Uniform assessments are ...

CMS changes mind on hospice drugs

The Centers for Medicaid & Medicare Services has revised guidance on authorization of hospice drugs for those under Medicare Advantage and Part D plans, according to a new memo.