The trouble with bullies

Share this article:
John O'Connor, Editorial Director
John O'Connor, Editorial Director

The Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments on the unpleasant subject of workplace harassment. At issue is whether an employer is responsible when the bully is not strictly a boss. 

The court's ruling — which will likely be announced in June — is surely going to be watched closely by operators and their legal eagles. That's because at many LTC facilities, the line between bosses and subordinates can blur. The decision could unleash a menagerie of workplace flowchart headaches.

Currently, an employer is held accountable if a supervisor torments a subordinate. But the employer is off the hook if the harassment takes places between two employees at the same level — unless it can be shown the employer turned a blind eye to the point of being negligent.

In the pending Supreme Court case, the victim was Maretta Vance, an African-American employee at Ball State University. Vance was a food service worker who claims she was harassed by Saundra Davis, another employee. Davis, who is white, insulted Vance with references to the Ku Klux Klan. 

An appellate court last year found the university could not be prosecuted, and negligence could not be proven. Davis was not the supervisor of the plaintiff and did not have the power to hire and fire. However, Davis gave Vance orders, prompting Justice Samuel Alito to ask what the most unpleasant thing was that Davis could have assigned Vance to do.

“Could it be chopping onions all day, every day?” he asked.

“Certainly,” Vance's attorney Daniel Ortiz answered.

Chief Justice John Roberts asked if an employee tasked with choosing music for his workplace could be considered a supervisor if he told another employee: “If you don't date me, it's going to be country music all day long.”

In contrast, Justice Elena Kagan
 suggested that the lower court's test might be too lenient on employers.

Probably the last thing operators need right now are additional labor-related concerns, especially over what constitutes harassment. 

But this ruling might give communities another new knot to untangle: When do bullying employees morph into supervisors?

Share this article:
close

Next Article in News

More in News

CMS updates coding instructions for hospice site of service, principal diagnosis

CMS updates coding instructions for hospice site of ...

A new Medicare hospice manual update includes instructions for which principal diagnosis codes are acceptable, and clarifies which codes should be used for services in a skilled versus non-skilled nursing ...

Vast majority of nursing home residents chronically constipated, and it's not well ...

Chronic constipation is highly prevalent in nursing homes and not well controlled, leading to a high likelihood that residents develop fecal impaction, according to findings from a first-of-its kind study.

Federal judge dismisses nursing home 'kickback' case; upholds large X-ray company's 'swapping' ...

The way mobile x-ray company Mobilex bills nursing homes is acceptable, a federal judge recently determined. Mobilex is the nation's largest provider of mobile diagnostic services. It had been facing whistleblower charges that it effectively paid kickbacks to nursing homes through an arrangement known as ...