The trouble with bullies

Share this article:
John O'Connor, Editorial Director
John O'Connor, Editorial Director

The Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments on the unpleasant subject of workplace harassment. At issue is whether an employer is responsible when the bully is not strictly a boss. 

The court's ruling — which will likely be announced in June — is surely going to be watched closely by operators and their legal eagles. That's because at many LTC facilities, the line between bosses and subordinates can blur. The decision could unleash a menagerie of workplace flowchart headaches.

Currently, an employer is held accountable if a supervisor torments a subordinate. But the employer is off the hook if the harassment takes places between two employees at the same level — unless it can be shown the employer turned a blind eye to the point of being negligent.

In the pending Supreme Court case, the victim was Maretta Vance, an African-American employee at Ball State University. Vance was a food service worker who claims she was harassed by Saundra Davis, another employee. Davis, who is white, insulted Vance with references to the Ku Klux Klan. 

An appellate court last year found the university could not be prosecuted, and negligence could not be proven. Davis was not the supervisor of the plaintiff and did not have the power to hire and fire. However, Davis gave Vance orders, prompting Justice Samuel Alito to ask what the most unpleasant thing was that Davis could have assigned Vance to do.

“Could it be chopping onions all day, every day?” he asked.

“Certainly,” Vance's attorney Daniel Ortiz answered.

Chief Justice John Roberts asked if an employee tasked with choosing music for his workplace could be considered a supervisor if he told another employee: “If you don't date me, it's going to be country music all day long.”

In contrast, Justice Elena Kagan
 suggested that the lower court's test might be too lenient on employers.

Probably the last thing operators need right now are additional labor-related concerns, especially over what constitutes harassment. 

But this ruling might give communities another new knot to untangle: When do bullying employees morph into supervisors?

Share this article:
close

Next Article in News

More in News

Septicemia, urinary tract infections rank high on latest list of hospital readmissions causes

Septicemia, urinary tract infections rank high on latest ...

Two infectious conditions common in long-term care settings — septicemia and urinary tract infections — were among the top causes of hospital readmissions for Medicare beneficiaries in 2011, according to ...

PharMerica to pay $200,000 settlement over federal charges of unsafe dispensing practices

Long-term care pharmacy company PharMerica has agreed to pay about $213,000 to settle charges that it dispensed medications without prescriptions and committed other breaches of the Controlled Substances Act, federal authorities announced Wednesday.

Shortchanging the Older Americans Act has led to unnecessary nursing home placements, ...

Chronic underfunding of the Older Americans Act is leading to unnecessary long-term care facility admissions, Sen. Bernard Sanders (I-VT) and 26 of his Democratic colleagues in the Senate said in a recent letter to Appropriations Committee leaders.