Daily Editors' Notes

The real key to keeping employees well

Share this article:
John O'Connor
John O'Connor
Many long-term care operators have begun to put wellness programs in place. And by most accounts, they seem to be working out well so far.

By encouraging staff to eliminate bad health choices and embrace good ones, operators can gain more productive employees who require fewer days off. And by the way, healthcare costs also can be trimmed. Employees in such programs tend to feel better and live longer, especially those who have given up cigarettes and dropped a few pounds.

By some estimates, employers are now spending more than $2 billion each year on wellness-related efforts. A Kaiser Family Foundation survey found that about half of all large firms have adopted programs that measure things like weight, blood pressure, blood sugar and cholesterol levels.

But do wellness programs really work? The short answer appears to be that we don't know. An analysis released by Rand Corp. concluded that there's not yet enough evidence on which to base an informed conclusion.

That's worth considering, because the stakes here are about to be raised. Starting in January, a provision in the Affordable Care Act will let employers raise insurance premiums for workers who fail to meet certain health metrics by up to 30% (currently, the maximum is 20%).

What we seem to have here are the makings of a good idea that's about to be taken to ridiculous extremes.

I think we can all agree that it's a good thing for employees to give up cigarettes (if they smoke) and lay off habits that pave the way to chronic health problems. And firms have both a self-interest and benevolent reasons for encouraging workers to avoid dangerous habits.

But in a nation that cherishes the notion of free choice, employers had better tread carefully when it comes to telling people what to do on their own time, especially if it's legal.

If you think you have legal and labor woes now, imagine what will happen if you happen to get branded as a discriminatory workplace.

Moreover, the idea of mandated wellness misses a larger point. Are people who obey wellness rules but perform jobs they despise likely to be healthier? I seriously doubt it.

Employers who want healthy employees should start by providing work that is perceived as being meaningful and important. Do that first, and you probably won't need to spend much time measuring body mass indexes or counting discarded ciggy butts.

Share this article:
close

Next Article in Daily Editors' Notes

Daily Editors' Notes

McKnight's Daily Editor's Notes features commentary on the latest in long-term care news. Entries are written by Editorial Director John O'Connor on Monday and Friday; Staff Writer Tim Mullaney on Tuesday, Editor James M. Berklan on Wednesday and Senior Editor Elizabeth Newman on Thursday.

    ALL MCKNIGHT'S BLOGS

    More in Daily Editors' Notes

    Finally, a Medicaid funding plan that actually makes sense

    Finally, a Medicaid funding plan that actually makes ...

    When politicians talk about Medicaid funding and nursing homes these days, an unsettling theme often emerges: the need to spend less of the former on the latter.

    What are the scouts saying about your long-term care organization?

    What are the scouts saying about your long-term ...

    There is no draft in senior living, nor really a need for one. But what if its three most dominant players were to be sized up? How might the scouts ...

    Butler County should take the addicts

    Butler County should take the addicts

    It's not a secret most county nursing homes are hemorrhaging money. That's why I was intrigued by a Butler County (OH) proposal to allow heroin addicts to stay short-term in ...