The big picture: Committee hardly super

Share this article:
John O'Connor, Editorial Director
John O'Connor, Editorial Director
Members of Congress used to have a foolproof way of dealing with controversial problems: They'd appoint a commission to look into them.

The panel would then spend months holding hearings, conducting research and developing scenarios. These components would then be bound into a massive report, which would be released in the most public way possible. Then lawmakers would ignore the report and get back their real job  — raising re-election funds.

But our federal legislature has since evolved. Consider what happened when budget negotiations collapsed last summer. Did Congress appoint a commission? No. Instead, we got a spanking new “super committee.” At press time, this 12-member panel had less than a week to reach recommendations that would cut the 10-year deficit by at least $1.2 trillion.

I'm predicting this group will not meet its mandate. It will likely fail because neither side really wants to compromise.
It was supposed to be different this time. Lawmakers put some stingers in place that would trigger nearly $1 trillion in automatic cuts should an impasse occur. Most of this feared “sequestration” would target discretionary spending and defense outlays.

When the super committee was formed, the sales pitch was that these looming cuts would be so severe that participants would be compelled to strike a deal. Politically, though, a failed deal might be the best option on the table.

Besides, Congress always can vote to hold off on any so-called automatic cuts that might prove problematic.

While this makes for fascinating theater, it glosses over some disturbing realities. Most troubling of all, our government's treasury is racing toward insolvency. Since the Kennedy administration, the people we have elected have been regularly approving spending plans that exceed revenues.

Lawmakers love to tell constituents about the new projects and federal dollars they have brought home. Spreading good news is a lot more fun to do that than explaining why benefits are being cut or taxes are being raised.

So it's no surprise that members of Congress focus primarily on things that help ensure a successful re-election. It's a good long-term strategy for them. But it's not so great for the rest of us.
Share this article:

More in News

Bulk of Medicaid to be managed care in two years: Avalere

Bulk of Medicaid to be managed care in ...

More than three-quarters of Medicaid beneficiaries will be enrolled in a managed care plan as of 2016, according to an Avalere Health analysis released Thursday. The numbers reveal that managed ...

Nursing home asked for employee's personal information too often, jury rules

The human resources department of a Maine nursing home did not properly protect a former employee's personal identification information, a jury recently ruled.

Test could confirm sepsis within an hour

Nursing home residents might benefit from a new way of diagnosing and treating sepsis made possible by discoveries out of the University of British Columbia.