The BIG Picture: a new style guide says hurtful language against seniors isn't OK

John O'Connor, Editorial Director
John O'Connor, Editorial Director
Death is a term that most of us are reluctant to talk about. It's almost as if we don't want to seem offensive.

But we're not nearly as reticent when it comes to thoughtless language that refers to our oldest citizens. The hurtful terms are blurted out all too often: biddy, codger, coot, fogy, fuddy-duddy, geezer, sweet old lady and vegetable, to name but a few.

Small wonder that 4 of 5 people who live past age 65 report they have been on the receiving end of ageist stereotypes. These are the ideas, attitudes, beliefs and practices that are biased against people because of advancing age. While the names and suggestions may vary, their intent is unmistakable: They let the person on the receiving end know that he or she is not quite measuring up.

But the time for a reality check has arrived. We are, after all, an aging nation. Currently, there are 76 million Americans who were born in the two decades immediately following World War II. These baby boomers represent more than 28% of the nation's overall population.

Life expectancy for men is now 82 years, and it's 85 years for women. Moreover, their ranks will only continue to grow for decades to come. So we should be more careful when we refer to older people—and how.

The International Longevity Center, and Aging Services of California recently teamed up to create Media Takes: On Aging. The stylebook is intended to help media professionals navigate the minefield of politically correct and incorrect ways of identifying and portraying the elderly.

(Full disclosure: My colleague Jim Berklan was contacted for the stylebook and is quoted in it.)

I found its recommendations for journalists personally helpful. But the suggestions would probably benefit any person who helps take care of older people. Such as:

• When in doubt, ask sources what term they prefer.

• Avoid being patronizing or using stereotyping terms.

• Use “individual” or “person.”

• Remember that older adults are not a monolithic group.

Perhaps the stylebook's best suggestion is to redefine aging as an active verb—a process we all experience rather than a label to be placed on the old and frail among us.

Admittedly, aging as an active verb is a concept that may take some getting used to. But it's a dramatic improvement on some of the terms still being used.

More in News

Experts tell lawmakers: Obama Medicare proposals would hurt long-term care — or maybe not

Experts tell lawmakers: Obama Medicare proposals would hurt ...

U.S. lawmakers heard mixed messages at a hearing Tuesday on how proposed Medicare cost-sharing reforms would impact long-term care. The House Ways and Means Subcommittee on Health focused in particular ...

Nursing home administrators can rise to 'unrealistic expectations' with disaster management, expert ...

One day after a powerful tornado destroyed a hospital and devastated an Oklahoma town, long-term care stakeholders gathered at a disaster preparedness conference organized by the Center for Preparedness Education, a joint endeavor of the Creighton University School of Medicine and the University of Nebraska ...

Long-term care physicians respond to report on antipsychotic over-prescribing

The top professional association of long-term care physicians and medical directors has reiterated its commitment to reducing the use of antipsychotics for dementia care. It did so Tuesday, in response to a recent report that criticized prescribing practices.