Supreme Court deals blow to unions, limits contraceptive mandate

Share this article:
Supreme Court to rule on whether providers can sue states over inadequate Medicaid rates
Supreme Court to rule on whether providers can sue states over inadequate Medicaid rates

The Supreme Court issued two highly anticipated rulings Monday morning with implications for long-term care providers. 

In a 5-4 decision, the justices ruled that the government cannot force private companies such as the Hobby Lobby chain of craft stores to provide the broad insurance coverage for contraceptives called for by the Affordable Care Act. The ruling could have a bearing on similar cases, including one brought by the nonprofit nursing home operator The Little Sisters of the Poor.

Also in a 5-4 ruling, the court limited the ability of some public sector unions to collect dues. The case involved home healthcare workers in Illinois, who are considered public sector employees because they receive payment from Medicaid. Under Monday's ruling, nonmember home health workers will no longer have to pay “fair share” fees, which some say could seriously undermine the strength of the unions. 

Share this article:

More in News

Expert says providers often wrongly threatened by PEPPER reports

Instead of fearing further scrutiny by federal authorities, providers should embrace the opportunity to get feedback in the form of PEPPER reports, legal experts said Monday at the LeadingAge annual meeting in Nashville.

Healthcare reform already driving diverse, dynamic long-term care models, LeadingAge leaders say

Healthcare reform already driving diverse, dynamic long-term care ...

One way to gauge the effects is healthcare reform is by looking at ongoing changes to the continuing care retirement community model, LeadingAge officials said Monday at the association's annual ...

Federal court: Nursing home can be sued for firing hairdresser who can ...

Is the ability to transport residents in their wheelchairs an essential function of a nursing home hairdresser? A federal appeals court says it's a valid question and is allowing a hairdresser to sue a facility that fired her.