SNF residents can sue operators over staffing, appeals court says

Share this article:
California nursing home residents have more ammunition to sue the operators of the facilities they live in for violating state nurse-staffing regulations, an appeals court ruled this week.
 
The First District Court of Appeal in San Francisco on Wednesday reinstated a lawsuit filed against Covenant Care, the owner of 16 nursing homes in the state's Alameda County. A group of residents had sued over accusations of failing to enforce nurse-staffing standards at least 35% of the time over a four-year period.
 
The appeals court took the case after a Superior Court judge sided with Covenant Care — which argued that only state regulators can enforce nursing home staffing requirements — and dismissed the case, the San Francisco Chronicle reported.
 
The plaintiffs stand to receive up to $500 for each violation of their rights, though the attorney representing them told the Chronicle that the goal of the lawsuit was to ensure that operators comply with the law. The appeals court decision comes on the heels of former residents of a Mariner Health Care facility in California suing over what they say was inadequate staffing.
Share this article:

More in News

A small team of workers responds best in emergencies, expert says

A small team of workers responds best in ...

Long-term care providers should consider a "flat" crisis management approach that relies on a core group of staff members, experts advised Wednesday at the LeadingAge annual conference.

Nursing homes have better pain and catheter management if leaders have more ...

Nursing homes led by administrators and directors of nursing with higher levels of education and certification have better outcomes on some key quality measures, according to recently published findings.

Court green-lights charges that a healthcare network underused observation stays

A whistleblower can continue to pursue charges that a Nevada healthcare network routinely admitted people as hospital inpatients when they should have been placed in observation status, a federal appeals court recently ruled.