Rehab facilities see reimbursement increase tied to quality measures

Share this article:

Inpatient rehab facilities will see a 2.2% payment rate increase under the IRF Prospective Payment System in fiscal year 2012. The system will also establish a new quality reporting system authorized by the Affordable Care Act.

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services announced the payment increase Friday as part of its final rule on Medicare payment rates for more than 1,200 freestanding and hospital-based inpatient rehabilitation facilities.

“The final rule extends to the Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility payment system a quality reporting program designed to encourage these facilities to adopt practices that will better protect patient safety and prevent hospital-acquired conditions, which is an essential part of providing well-coordinated patient-and-family-centered care,” said CMS Administrator Donald Berwick, M.D.

Under the rule, IRFs will submit data on two quality measures: one for urinary catheter-associated urinary tract infection and one for new or worsening pressure ulcers. An additional one — a 30-day Comprehensive All Cause Risk Standardized Readmission — is still being developed.

Share this article:

More in News

A small team of workers responds best in emergencies, expert says

A small team of workers responds best in ...

Long-term care providers should consider a "flat" crisis management approach that relies on a core group of staff members, experts advised Wednesday at the LeadingAge annual conference.

Nursing homes have better pain and catheter management if leaders have more ...

Nursing homes led by administrators and directors of nursing with higher levels of education and certification have better outcomes on some key quality measures, according to recently published findings.

Court green-lights charges that a healthcare network underused observation stays

A whistleblower can continue to pursue charges that a Nevada healthcare network routinely admitted people as hospital inpatients when they should have been placed in observation status, a federal appeals court recently ruled.