Daily Editors' Notes

Readmission penalties could harm hospitals and SNFs

Share this article:
John O'Connor, editorial director, McKnight's Long-Term Care News
John O'Connor, editorial director, McKnight's Long-Term Care News
Economic incentives – both good and bad – are a proven way to modify behavior.

Reward favorable deeds and more of them are likely to happen. Penalize bad habits and fewer people are likely to engage in them.

But what happens when a penalty is based on a dubious premise? Many hospitals may soon be forced to answer that question. And many skilled care operators may have to live with some very unwelcome fallout.

Come October, hospitals with high readmission rates will face penalties in the form of Medicare payment reductions of up to 1%. This handicap will initially be associated with Medicare patient populations diagnosed with heart failure, heart attacks or pneumonia.

Consider: If a hospital received the maximum penalty of 1% and submitted a claim for $10,000 for a surgical stay, Medicare would deduct $100 and reimburse only $9,900. That might not seem like much of a pay cut, but the numbers can add up pretty quickly. By some estimates, this payment shift will affect more than 2,000 hospitals, reducing Medicare payments by more than $280 million.

By the way, the ceiling for the penalties will triple by 2014. Ouch!

As you might imagine, many hospitals are in no hurry for October to get here. Acute-care operators maintain they have taken pro-active steps to prevent avoidable readmissions. Their efforts include programs with more aggressive follow-ups, better coordination with pharmacists and family physicians, and improved data sharing with skilled care providers.

Hospitals are expressing deep – and in my view, legitimate – concerns that they could easily be unfairly penalized by federal number crunchers.

Many analysts see hospital alliances as a key survival strategy for skilled care operators. But what happens when their new partner might be going broke? We may soon find out.

Share this article:
close

Next Article in Daily Editors' Notes

Daily Editors' Notes

McKnight's Daily Editor's Notes features commentary on the latest in long-term care news. Entries are written by Editorial Director John O'Connor on Monday and Friday; Staff Writer Tim Mullaney on Tuesday, Editor James M. Berklan on Wednesday and Senior Editor Elizabeth Newman on Thursday.

    ALL MCKNIGHT'S BLOGS

    More in Daily Editors' Notes

    Could you make money if Mom's nursing home does a good job?

    Could you make money if Mom's nursing home ...

    A man recently raised more than $51,000 ... to make potato salad. And in a similar type of online campaign, senior living investment company Mainstreet raised more than $1.6 million ...

    Finally, a Medicaid funding plan that actually makes sense

    Finally, a Medicaid funding plan that actually makes ...

    When politicians talk about Medicaid funding and nursing homes these days, an unsettling theme often emerges: the need to spend less of the former on the latter.

    What are the scouts saying about your long-term care organization?

    What are the scouts saying about your long-term ...

    There is no draft in senior living, nor really a need for one. But what if its three most dominant players were to be sized up? How might the scouts ...