Providers would be overburdened by Medicare overpayment rule, expert notes

Share this article:

A proposed rule that would require Medicare providers to return overpayments within 60 days of detection could significantly increase administrative time and costs, an expert says.

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services in February proposed a rule mandating that providers report and return overpayments of Medicare Part A and Part B. Medicare Part A pays for short-term stays in skilled nursing and rehabilitation facilities.

But the rule is not consistent with providers' expectations, attorney Robert L. Roth said in a Bureau of National Affairs webinar this week. He said the regulation contains a 10-year look-back period that CMS picked because it's on the outer limit of the federal False Claims Act statute of limitations.

“The 10-year standard inappropriately links simple payment errors with the FCA liability standard, which is intended for intentional fraud,” Roth said in the webinar.

Under the rule, providers must specify to CMS why the overpayment went through, within 60 days of identifying it. Failing to do so beyond the 60-day limit would create a FCA obligation and incur a $10,000 fine for each overpayment.

Share this article:

More in News

A small team of workers responds best in emergencies, expert says

A small team of workers responds best in ...

Long-term care providers should consider a "flat" crisis management approach that relies on a core group of staff members, experts advised Wednesday at the LeadingAge annual conference.

Nursing homes have better pain and catheter management if leaders have more ...

Nursing homes led by administrators and directors of nursing with higher levels of education and certification have better outcomes on some key quality measures, according to recently published findings.

Court green-lights charges that a healthcare network underused observation stays

A whistleblower can continue to pursue charges that a Nevada healthcare network routinely admitted people as hospital inpatients when they should have been placed in observation status, a federal appeals court recently ruled.