Provider group praises anti-union legislation

Share this article:

A leading assisted living advocacy group applauded legislation that would reverse two recent pro-union regulations issued by the National Labor Relations Board.

Rep. John Kline (R-MN), who is the House Education and the Workforce Committee chairman, introduced the Workforce Democracy and Fairness Act  on Oct. 5. If passed, the legislation would mandate that employers have at least 14 days to get ready for pre-election cases before an NLRB election officer; ensure union elections will not be held in less than 35 days; and allow workers to choose the type of personal contact information provided to unions.

It also would reverse the NLRB's Specialty Healthcare decision, which would make it possible for workers of different classifications to be represented by multiple unions within the same long-term care facility.

The Assisted Living Federation of America has been vocal in its criticism of the NLRB decisions, arguing the rulings would increase costs for seniors living in long-term care facilities.

“Recent decisions by the NLRB clearly indicate its lack of concern for holding fair union elections respecting the rights of employees and employers,” said ALFA President and CEO Richard P. Grimes. “Chairman Kline's bill will restore much needed balance between employers and unions.”

Share this article:

More in News

A small team of workers responds best in emergencies, expert says

A small team of workers responds best in ...

Long-term care providers should consider a "flat" crisis management approach that relies on a core group of staff members, experts advised Wednesday at the LeadingAge annual conference.

Nursing homes have better pain and catheter management if leaders have more ...

Nursing homes led by administrators and directors of nursing with higher levels of education and certification have better outcomes on some key quality measures, according to recently published findings.

Court green-lights charges that a healthcare network underused observation stays

A whistleblower can continue to pursue charges that a Nevada healthcare network routinely admitted people as hospital inpatients when they should have been placed in observation status, a federal appeals court recently ruled.