Long-term care advocacy group cheers executive order barring arbitration agreements, urges further action

Share this article:

A prominent long-term care consumer advocacy group hailed a recent executive order banning certain government contractors from using arbitration agreements, saying this is a step toward eliminating these agreements in nursing homes and assisted living facilities.

The executive order does not apply to long-term care providers, as Medicare and Medicaid providers are not considered federal contractors under "long-standing policy," the American Health Care Association/National Center for Assisted Living emphasized.* However, the National Consumer Voice for Quality Long-Term Care seized on the action from the White House to press a case against arbitration agreements in long-term care.

Parties to an arbitration agreement are obligated to settle any future disputes through an arbitration process rather than in a court of law. Under the “Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces”executive order, announced July 31, government contractors and subcontractors with contracts of at least $1 million will not be able to have workers sign agreements to arbitrate sexual harassment and civil rights complaints.

“The [order] issued by President Obama is an important call to action for Congress and the Administration to address the widespread use of forced, pre-dispute arbitration clauses within all contracts but, in particular, the harmful and all-too-common inclusion of such clauses within long-term care admissions agreements,” stated Robyn Grant, director of public policy and advocacy at the National Consumer Voice for Quality Long-Term Care.

Long-term care facilities increasingly have been using arbitration agreements, often requiring potential residents to sign them as a condition of admission, Consumer Voice noted in a statement released Friday. The advocacy organization said that agreements might be “buried within the fine print” of admissions documents, and that consumers with no other options for care essentially have no choice but to sign such agreements.

Enforcement of nursing home arbitration agreements has sparked controversy and legal actions, many of which involve family members pursuing wrongful death claims against providers. Courts have been split on whether these family members are bound by arbitration agreements, but the Supreme Court so far has not taken up the question.

Editor's Note: The original version of this article has been updated with this statement from an AHCA/NCAL email to McKnight's.
Share this article:

More in News

A small team of workers responds best in emergencies, expert says

A small team of workers responds best in ...

Long-term care providers should consider a "flat" crisis management approach that relies on a core group of staff members, experts advised Wednesday at the LeadingAge annual conference.

Nursing homes have better pain and catheter management if leaders have more ...

Nursing homes led by administrators and directors of nursing with higher levels of education and certification have better outcomes on some key quality measures, according to recently published findings.

Court green-lights charges that a healthcare network underused observation stays

A whistleblower can continue to pursue charges that a Nevada healthcare network routinely admitted people as hospital inpatients when they should have been placed in observation status, a federal appeals court recently ruled.