Daily Editors' Notes

Let's hope they don't give war a chance

Share this article:
John O'Connor, editorial director, McKnight's Long-Term Care News
John O'Connor, editorial director, McKnight's Long-Term Care News

In recent weeks, Congress has come under intense pressure to avoid sequestration. Sequestration is an odd term most people outside of Washington have never heard of. Basically, it's a fancy way to describe a $1 trillion cut to federal spending that's set to take effect in January.

In May, Kindred Healthcare CEO Paul Diaz told the Senate Finance Committee that sequestration could “cause a level of instability that I fear will prevent the kind of innovation needed to transform our healthcare system.” Diaz makes a good point.

And let's face it: Few providers relish the prospect of lower Medicare payments.

But many long-term care insiders are starting to wonder if sequestration might not be so bad after all. That's because a provision in the sequestration law caps Medicare funding cuts at 2%. All things considered, a 2% reduction is starting to look better with each passing day.

Of course, Congress could still revisit the automatic spending cuts set to kick in on January 2. But for that to happen, they would need to find enough votes to do so. Given the current high level of partisan vitriol in Washington, getting Congress to simply agree on what day it is could prove problematic. The odds of resolving a sequestration challenge? Magic 8 Ball says, “Don't think so.”

It's highly unlikely Congress ever intended for a sequestration kick-in to be a reality. Many members who originally voted to approve this option likely felt that the pressure from the looming cuts would shame their colleagues into action. Of course, betting that shameless people will suddenly come to their senses is sort of like betting that your goldfish will take up the harmonica.

Now, there is one way the current Congress could rid itself of the sequestration headache: Declare war. But we know our trusted leaders would never do something that cynical. Right?


Share this article:

Daily Editors' Notes

McKnight's Daily Editor's Notes features commentary on the latest in long-term care news. Entries are written by Editorial Director John O'Connor on Monday and Friday; Staff Writer Tim Mullaney on Tuesday, Editor James M. Berklan on Wednesday and Senior Editor Elizabeth Newman on Thursday.

    ALL MCKNIGHT'S BLOGS

    More in Daily Editors' Notes

    Dedicated nurses are in it for the money

    Dedicated nurses are in it for the money

    I'm here to suggest that providers start seeking out nurses who are not even motivated mainly by the desire to help other people.

    The nursing home survey system is about to get a much closer look

    The nursing home survey system is about to ...

    You had to know this was coming. Earlier this week, the New York Times reported that many nursing homes are submitting massaged staffing and quality indicator data to the feds. ...

    Ice buckets, fund-raising and long-term care

    Ice buckets, fund-raising and long-term care

    Whoever dreamed up the ALS Ice Bucket Challenge should be given a medal — and immediately hired to speak at the next long-term care association conference. Such creativity and that ...