Lawmakers fail to repeal provision designed to help finance healthcare reform

Share this article:
Sen. Max Baucus (D-MT)
Sen. Max Baucus (D-MT)

The Senate failed to muster the votes Monday to repeal an unpopular tax reporting mandate that was passed to help finance the healthcare reform law.

The Democrats' plan, introduced by Sen. Max Baucus (D-MT), collapsed by a vote of 53 to 44. A Republican plan also was defeated by a vote of 61 to 35. The Republican proposal, introduced by Sen. Mike Johanns (R-NE), would have offset the lost revenue with unspent or unobligated federal funds, as determined by the director of the Office of Management and Budget. The tax reporting provision requires that businesses that spend a cumulative total of $600 or more with one vendor, contractor or supplier file a 1099 tax form with the Internal Revenue Service identifying recipient of the money, according to The New York Times.

Opponents of the law argued that it was an “intrusion on free enterprise.” Another proposal for repeal of this provision is likely to come down the pipeline, the newspaper reported. Republicans, who will take over Congress next year, have been calling for repeal or overhaul of the healthcare reform law.

Share this article:

More in News

A small team of workers responds best in emergencies, expert says

A small team of workers responds best in ...

Long-term care providers should consider a "flat" crisis management approach that relies on a core group of staff members, experts advised Wednesday at the LeadingAge annual conference.

Nursing homes have better pain and catheter management if leaders have more ...

Nursing homes led by administrators and directors of nursing with higher levels of education and certification have better outcomes on some key quality measures, according to recently published findings.

Court green-lights charges that a healthcare network underused observation stays

A whistleblower can continue to pursue charges that a Nevada healthcare network routinely admitted people as hospital inpatients when they should have been placed in observation status, a federal appeals court recently ruled.