Daily Editors' Notes

For long-term care operators, safe bets can be anything but

Share this article:
John O'Connor
John O'Connor
If there's one thing long-term care operators contemplating the coming years should know by now, it's this: There are no guarantees.

That's worth keeping in mind as various can't-miss strategies that ensure future success are being pitched your way. Not saying the new ideas are bad or won't work. It's just that many of them may not deliver as promised.

From hoteliers who underestimated the “care” part of senior living to developers who did the same, many wishful thinkers have had to watch their plans for success fail in a big way. In fact, the nation's landscape is dotted with well-intended senior living projects that now serve a modified or different purpose.

It was less than half a decade ago that continuing care retirement communities seemed like a can't-miss opportunity: Entry fees would cover many of the start-up costs, residents could be transitioned into higher acuity (and increasingly, higher pay settings), and happy residents would be a powerful recruitment tool.

Fast forward to 2013: Thanks to the Great Recession, a related housing market crash, and governing boards that got over their skis, a growing number of CCRCs are doing what seemed impossible: failing.

Just this week, a CCRC in James City, VA, announced it will seek bankruptcy protection. By reorganizing under Chapter 11, WindsorMeade hopes to reorganize in a way that reimburses its debt holders.

Of course, that's small potatoes compared to the Clare at Water Tower property in Chicago. There, an affiliate defaulted on more than $229 million in debt. Less spectacularly, Clare Oaks, a retirement community in Bartlett, IL, just emerged from Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. This came after a more than a yearlong recapitalization and restructuring process.

In retrospect, it's easy to see that these and other failed projects had one key flaw in common — they expected to collect money that never materialized.

Many operators now find themselves in an uncomfortable situation. Their current business model is flailing, or soon will be. Yet the available options are not so easy to assess.

I don't have the insight or acumen to say what path is the best. So I'll just pass along some of Mom's advice: If it looks too good to be true, it probably is.

Share this article:
close

Next Article in Daily Editors' Notes

Daily Editors' Notes

McKnight's Daily Editor's Notes features commentary on the latest in long-term care news. Entries are written by Editorial Director John O'Connor on Monday and Friday; Staff Writer Tim Mullaney on Tuesday, Editor James M. Berklan on Wednesday and Senior Editor Elizabeth Newman on Thursday.

    ALL MCKNIGHT'S BLOGS

    More in Daily Editors' Notes

    What are the scouts saying about your long-term care organization?

    What are the scouts saying about your long-term ...

    There is no draft in senior living, nor really a need for one. But what if its three most dominant players were to be sized up? How might the scouts ...

    Butler County should take the addicts

    Butler County should take the addicts

    It's not a secret most county nursing homes are hemorrhaging money. That's why I was intrigued by a Butler County (OH) proposal to allow heroin addicts to stay short-term in ...

    Too late: Change is here for long-term care

    Too late: Change is here for long-term care

    If someone were to complain that long-term care has become a "same old, same old" scene, you might be inclined to agree. Staffing, reimbursement, over-regulation — they're all ongoing challenges ...