Daily Editors' Notes

First presidential debate leaves long-term care operators with many questions, few answers

Share this article:
John O'Connor, editorial director, McKnight's Long-Term Care News
John O'Connor, editorial director, McKnight's Long-Term Care News
If you're wondering what Wednesday night's presidential debate means for long-term care, you have plenty of company.

By the time both men wrapped up, it seemed that there were far more unanswered questions than answers. Will Medicaid become a block grant program? Will vouchers be a part of Medicare? Will funding to nursing homes be gutted? Will Big Bird have to leave Sesame Street if he falls and breaks a hip? Does Big Bird even have a hip? At this point, who knows?

The general consensus is that an energized Mitt Romney took it to a seemingly disinterested and occasionally perturbed Barack Obama. Whether this performance will continue in subsequent debates — and whether it will be enough to let Romney overcome Obama's lead in key swing states — remains to be seen.

It's obvious both men are intelligent, gifted orators. Each clearly wants to make the United States a better place to live. Yes, they have different ideas about what a fundamentally sound nation should look like. But I don't take issue with their philosophies or priorities.

What I do take issue with is the fact that both men seem to have forgotten how the levers in Washington actually work.

They apparently need to be reminded that we have this thing in the nation's capital called a Congress. It has 435 House members and 100 Senators. And oh, by the way, their job is to make laws and determine how tax dollars are spent. I realize these may be trifling points. But these 535 proverbial elephants in the room usually determine whether talking points ever advance beyond the good intentions phase.

That's worth keeping in mind as you hear each man describe how he alone can make things better over the next four years. In fact, neither is likely to get very far if Congress doesn't share a similar vision.

The bottom line is that unless the president we elect also has his own party in both Congressional chambers (including at least 60 supporters in the Senate), he cannot do much more than the rest of us.

Our Congress has its flaws and seems to be unusually dysfunctional these days. Few of its members can debate as well as the two men that more than 50 million of us watched Wednesday night. 

But here's the thing: When it comes to the big-ticket items before our nation, Congress always gets the last word.

 

Share this article:
close

Next Article in Daily Editors' Notes

Daily Editors' Notes

McKnight's Daily Editor's Notes features commentary on the latest in long-term care news. Entries are written by Editorial Director John O'Connor on Monday and Friday; Staff Writer Tim Mullaney on Tuesday, Editor James M. Berklan on Wednesday and Senior Editor Elizabeth Newman on Thursday.

    ALL MCKNIGHT'S BLOGS

    More in Daily Editors' Notes

    Too late: Change is here for long-term care

    Too late: Change is here for long-term care

    If someone were to complain that long-term care has become a "same old, same old" scene, you might be inclined to agree. Staffing, reimbursement, over-regulation — they're all ongoing challenges ...

    Think you're having a weird day? Take a lesson from the pros

    Think you're having a weird day? Take a ...

    There are plenty of developments that can force you to reconsider the way you do business. Whether it's merger/acquisition fallout, notable court rulings, additional regulatory guidance or legislation being introduced, ...

    Accepting what nurses cannot fix

    Accepting what nurses cannot fix

    Like perhaps many of you, I come from a long line of "fixers." Multiple people whose schedules are conflicting? We'll coordinate. Someone isn't able to find a job? We'll provide ...