Daily Editors' Notes

Doubling down on a Supreme Court thumping

Share this article:
John O'Connor, editorial director, McKnight's Long-Term Care News
John O'Connor, editorial director, McKnight's Long-Term Care News
When I recently predicted the new healthcare law's repeal, plenty of people disagreed.

One of these unfortunates is Elizabeth Newman, a colleague and confidant here at McKnight's. Elizabeth was so moved by my keen observation that she wrote a blog predicting just the opposite. I have high regard for Elizabeth, but there is a critical flaw in her argument: It relies too heavily on logic, supportive points and common sense.

The thesis supporting my position is far less elegant. Simply stated, people (including Supreme Court justices) tend to take care of their own. As things now stand, that would appear to give the Republican clan a 5-4 advantage on the nation's highest court. That is also the vote by which I expect Obamacare (aka the Affordable Care Act) to be rejected (or at least severely crippled).

Admittedly, my view gives short shrift to rational thought. But having seen it play out repeatedly, I have found clan loyalty to be an effective predictor of human behavior. 

In other words, logic shmogic. The reality is that we humans didn't fall out of the trees that long ago. Or as Robert Penn Warren wrote in “All the King's Men”: “Man is conceived in sin and born in corruption and he passeth from the stink of the didie to the stench of the shroud. There is always something.”

The “something” in the Obamacare case? Quite simply, these justices are going to remember who put them where they are. Regardless of the resulting political firestorm, I'm sure at least five Right-leaning justices will be willing to take one for the team.

Few would call me a betting man. But I am backing up this prediction with a little wager. In the case of Newman v. O'Connor, the loser buys lunch.

Now there's a meal to look forward to. Just hope I'm not eating crow.

Share this article:
close

Next Article in Daily Editors' Notes

Daily Editors' Notes

McKnight's Daily Editor's Notes features commentary on the latest in long-term care news. Entries are written by Editorial Director John O'Connor on Monday and Friday; Staff Writer Tim Mullaney on Tuesday, Editor James M. Berklan on Wednesday and Senior Editor Elizabeth Newman on Thursday.

    ALL MCKNIGHT'S BLOGS

    More in Daily Editors' Notes

    When it comes to fixing long-term care, it's time to start thinking outside the tank

    When it comes to fixing long-term care, it's ...

    I was reminded of a cinema classic when I heard another think tank is being put together to consider improvements for our nation's long-term care system.

    The potential break-up between hospitals and long-term care

    The potential break-up between hospitals and long-term care

    The attempts of the hospital lobby and long-term care to move beyond casually dating to going steady hit a snag at the steps of a courthouse Monday.

    A time for nursing homes to embrace the cheddar while they can

    A time for nursing homes to embrace the ...

    It can almost be classified as a case of no good deed going unpunished. However, even though this is about long-term care, let's not be quite so skeptical. Progress is ...