Doctor with ties to nursing home controversy a victim in car bombing

Share this article:
Dr. Trent P. Pierce, a former nursing home medical director involved in legal controversy, was the victim of a car bombing at his West Memphis, AR, home late last week. The 54-year-old chairman of the state medical board, remained in critical condition as of press time. Authorities said they had no suspects in the attack but said they were examining lawsuits the physician was involved in.

Officials said they were investigating what was believed to be a homemade bomb left in the driveway by Pierce's car. He suffered severe burns, shrapnel injuries and a badly injured eye in an attack last Wednesday, according to local reports.

Up until a few weeks ago, Pierce was a co-defendant along with Golden Living (formerly Beverly Enterprises) in a wrongful death suit that reached the Arkansas Supreme Court. He was recently released from that case, however, but has been in involved in other controversy through the years. He was first named to the state medical board 12 years ago. He was a facility medical director for the former Beverly Enterprises until 2004, when the facility was sold. He currently has no ties to the company, said spokesman Blair Jackson.

Share this article:

More in News

$1.3 million settlement marks second recent deal over SNF supervision of therapy providers

$1.3 million settlement marks second recent deal over ...

A Maryland nursing home company has agreed to a $1.3 million settlement over charges that it did not prevent overbilling by its contracted therapy provider, federal authorities announced Monday. This ...

MedPAC chairman: Three-day stay requirement is 'archaic'

The government should pay for skilled nursing care without a preliminary three-day hospital stay, and the recovery auditor program should be reformed, Medicare Payment Advisory Commission members said at a meeting Friday.

Nursing homes can't carve out billing, collections in arbitration agreements, AR Supreme ...

A nursing home arbitration agreement largely reserved the provider's rights to sue residents while limiting residents' legal options, causing it to fail a "mutual obligation" requirement, the Arkansas Supreme Court recently ruled .