Why nursing homes can exhale — but not get complacent

Share this content:
James M. Berklan
James M. Berklan

The biggest story of the last week easily has been the news that full enforcement of nursing homes' new survey system will be postponed a year. 

The cheering could be heard from the halls of Kennett Square to the cubicles of Sioux Falls, and beyond.

Indeed, it is good news for nursing home operators and all of their compliance officers, whose blood pressure should now lower a few millimeters. If only for a while.

Per the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' memo on the subject, the feds are still going to expect providers to follow the new rules. They just won't be coming after any non-compliers with their biggest sticks, as my colleague Elizabeth Newman noted in breaking the story on Wednesday.

Offenders instead will be sent to study hall and/or be directed to write a note how they would change their behavior. That's old-school parlance for receiving additional in-service trainings and being required to write plans of correction. 

It beats dealing with civil monetary penalties, denials of payment or termination, some of the standard threats and punishments — which, it must be pointed out, will still be an option for the Phase 1 quality requirements, which went into effect Nov. 28, 2016. In other words, no one has a get-out-of-jail-free card for anything already in play.

Back to the education theme, a McKnight's reader likely has it right about this delay business. The commenter under this surging article points out that the delay is likely for surveyors' own benefit as much as it is providers', if not more so. The educated hunch is regulators aren't, and wouldn't be, ready to enforce the new provisions come Nov. 28, so a postponement is in everyone's best interest. Why else would the delay be declared so early? Last fall, CMS had no problem springing hundreds of pages of new requirements on providers and then giving them just a few months to come into compliance.

Regardless of the reason, providers should "take the win," as the McKnight's article commenter "Bucky" put it. There are, after all, still the potential gutting of Medicaid, ongoing labor challenges and plenty of litigious-happy plaintiffs and prosecutors to worry about.

Yes, take the win. Goodness knows there are never enough of them to go around.

Follow James M. Berklan @JimBerklan. Email him at jim.berklan@mcknights.com.

close

Next Article in Daily Editors' Notes

Daily Editors' Notes

McKnight's Daily Editors' Notes features commentary on the latest in long-term care news and issues. Entries are written by Editorial Director John O'Connor, Editor James M. Berklan, Senior Editor Elizabeth Newman and Staff Writer Emily Mongan.

    ALL MCKNIGHT'S BLOGS