A rescue plan that delivers more capital to LTC?

Share this content:
John O'Connor
John O'Connor
When it comes to delivering capital for senior living projects, mortgage financing giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have a long but checkered history.

Both also appear to be in their death beds. But a new plan to keep them alive might also deliver some much-needed capital to this sector.

First, some background: Congress created Fannie May in 1938 to help a housing market upended by the Great Depression. Congress added Freddie Mac in 1970 to give mortgage lenders a continuous funding source.

Over the years, both have bought mortgages from financial institutions, which they have either kept in their portfolios – or bundled into bond packages.

Currently, they collectively back more than half of all mortgages created by our nation's banks. But their days may be numbered.

In recent years, the firms have cost taxpayers just shy of $150 billion in bailouts, if dividend payments are considered. Of the $117 billion in taxpayer bailouts Fannie alone has received, only $26 billion has been repaid.

Given these realities, it's no surprise that Washington insiders now treat Fannie and Freddie as personas non grata. The White House has laid out two possible post mortems. One scenario has the government creating smaller governmental or private entities to fill the void. A second option lets the private sector take over completely.

For their part, Congressional Republicans have favored proposals that simply close down Fannie and Freddie.

Jim Millstein, who left the Treasury Department to start his own firm, has crafted an alternative three-stroke plan:

First, it would restructure Fannie and Freddie. Their investment portfolios would be liquidated.

Second, both would be stripped of their special charters and government guarantee.

Third, they would be allowed to keep their profits (instead of having the Treasury use them as a government bailout repayment). Strong medicine? You bet. But it just might save the patients.

Moreover, a successfully executed reinvention would bring new capital to the senior living sector. And by the way, taxpayer funds would be fully repaid.

Imagine that: a plan that might actually make things better going forward.

Of course, Millstein does have a unique advantage. Unlike many people seeking our votes a week from Tuesday, he has focused on rebuilding a strong foundation. 

Unfortunately, many of the people we hired to solve the problem can't seem to get past slinging the dirt.


Next Article in Daily Editors' Notes

Daily Editors' Notes

McKnight's Daily Editors' Notes features commentary on the latest in long-term care news and issues. Entries are written by Editorial Director John O'Connor, Editor James M. Berklan, Senior Editor Elizabeth Newman and Staff Writer Marty Stempniak.