Court upholds big damages award to Ventas in HCP case

Share this article:
Ventas CEO Debra Cafaro
Ventas CEO Debra Cafaro
Ventas has once again won a legal victory, with a federal appeals court upholding a $101.6 million damages award in its favor against HCP Inc.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit unanimously ruled in favor of Ventas in May. In June, HCP said it filed a petition for a rehearing of the verdict in the case, and Ventas in turn said it would “vigorously oppose” the request.

In a battle between two huge real estate investment trusts, Ventas accuses HCP of driving up the price of Sunrise Senior Living REIT, which the former purchased for $1.8 billion in 2007. Both companies were in a second round of bidding on Sunrise, but negotiations broke down between HCP and Sunrise before the final bid deadline. Ventas then went public in January 2007 with a bid at $15 per unit to buy Sunrise. Shortly afterward, HCP submitted a bid at $18 per share, but it put several conditions on the purchase. Ventas then increased its original bid to $16.50 and subsequently closed the deal.

In May 2007, Ventas filed against HCP, asserting claims of “tortious interference” with contract and prospective advantage. In order to prove tortious interference, Ventas had to prove it had a reasonable likelihood of getting Sunrise at $15 a unit; that HCP knew about the probable acquisition; that HCP intentionally interfered with the acquisition at $15 a unit; that the interference then prevented Ventas from getting Sunrise at $15 a unit; and that this was a substantial factor in damages to Ventas.

In upholding the 2009 jury verdict, Court of Appeals Judge Eric Clay wrote HCP's conduct “casts further doubt on the genuineness of its offer,” noting that HCP never sent Sunrise a signed, unconditional offer. The court also ruled for a trial solely to determine if HCP should have to pay punitive damages.
Share this article:
close

Next Article in News

More in News

$1.3 million settlement marks second recent deal over SNF supervision of therapy providers

$1.3 million settlement marks second recent deal over ...

A Maryland nursing home company has agreed to a $1.3 million settlement over charges that it did not prevent overbilling by its contracted therapy provider, federal authorities announced Monday. This ...

MedPAC chairman: Three-day stay requirement is 'archaic'

The government should pay for skilled nursing care without a preliminary three-day hospital stay, and the recovery auditor program should be reformed, Medicare Payment Advisory Commission members said at a meeting Friday.

Nursing homes can't carve out billing, collections in arbitration agreements, AR Supreme ...

A nursing home arbitration agreement largely reserved the provider's rights to sue residents while limiting residents' legal options, causing it to fail a "mutual obligation" requirement, the Arkansas Supreme Court recently ruled .