Chronically ill? Give up hope, researchers say

If you are chronically ill and looking to improve your quality of life, researchers at the University of Michigan have some counterintuitive advice: Give up hope.

For this study, the U-M Center for Behavioral and Decision Sciences in Medicine surveyed recent colostomy patients. One group was told the colostomy would be reversed in several months, while another group was told their conditions were permanent. Patients who believed their condition to be temporary had a more difficult time adjusting to their new situation, sacrificing happiness in favor of hope for the future, researchers found. The group that had no hope for getting better reported greater levels of happiness since they had gotten on with their lives.

Researchers did note that hope is an important part of happiness, but warned against what they call the "dark side of hope." Physicians should be especially mindful of the dichotomy when diagnosing patients.

"I don't think we should take hope away. But I think we have to be careful about building up people's hope so much that they put off living their lives," said lead researchers Peter A. Ubel, M.D. The report appears in the November edition of the journal Health Psychology.

More in News

Senate bill seeks to empower long-term care ombudsmen, strengthen eldercare workforce

Senate bill seeks to empower long-term care ombudsmen, ...

Senate lawmakers are seeking to strengthen and expand the long-term care ombudsman program and boost the eldercare workforce through a bill to reauthorize the Older Americans Act of 1965. The ...

CMS: Providers may need to reimburse beneficiaries due to inaccurate therapy denial ...

Therapy providers should review therapy cap denials for 2013 and refund any beneficiary payments for these services, according to a Medicare newsletter released Thursday.

Court upholds $5.75 million verdict against former nursing home officers, board members ...

A $5.75 million verdict will stand and there will be no new trial in the case against officers and board members of a former Pennsylvania nursing home, a federal judge recently ruled.