Ask the legal expert: What legal considerations should providers ponder before joining an ACO?

Share this article:
Attorney John Durso, Ungaretti & Harris LLP
Attorney John Durso, Ungaretti & Harris LLP
Q: What should we, as operators, be aware of legally when it comes to getting into or forming an accountable care organization (ACO)? 

A: Your organization can add value by integrating with acute care providers, in an ACO or otherwise, and ensuring that individuals receive efficient, high-quality care as they transition from the acute to the post-acute and long-term care environments.

The creation of an ACO, or otherwise integrating acute and post-acute providers, does however, implicate a variety of legal issues.

For example, if your organization is exempt from federal income tax, probably the most important legal issue for you is ensuring that participation in the ACO does not jeopardize your tax-exempt status. The IRS has specific rules regarding the ability of tax-exempt entities to collaborate with taxable entities, so ensure that your ACO is organized and operated in a way that complies with those rules.

You also want certainty that the distribution of any shared savings or payments are structured to meet exceptions and regulatory safe harbors to the fraud and abuse laws so the government does not consider the distribution of shared savings to be a disguised payment for a patient referral.

Further, ACOs should be organized to mitigate risk that an antitrust enforcement agency would interpret the effort as collusion on the part of otherwise competing healthcare providers. Coordination in an ACO is permissible if entities can demonstrate that their efforts create certain efficiencies that benefit consumers.

Fortunately, federal agencies have issued ACO-specific legal guidance, which provides more certainty for operators interested in taking advantage of these new financial incentives.

Please send your legal questions to John Durso at ltcnews@mcknights.com.
Share this article:

More in News

$1.3 million settlement marks second recent deal over SNF supervision of therapy providers

$1.3 million settlement marks second recent deal over ...

A Maryland nursing home company has agreed to a $1.3 million settlement over charges that it did not prevent overbilling by its contracted therapy provider, federal authorities announced Monday. This ...

MedPAC chairman: Three-day stay requirement is 'archaic'

The government should pay for skilled nursing care without a preliminary three-day hospital stay, and the recovery auditor program should be reformed, Medicare Payment Advisory Commission members said at a meeting Friday.

Nursing homes can't carve out billing, collections in arbitration agreements, AR Supreme ...

A nursing home arbitration agreement largely reserved the provider's rights to sue residents while limiting residents' legal options, causing it to fail a "mutual obligation" requirement, the Arkansas Supreme Court recently ruled .